.

Monday, June 10, 2019

Ethics and Asylum Seekers in Australia Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Ethics and Asylum Seekers in Australia - Essay ExampleThe majority of the refugees ended up in the two Pacific Island nations which the Australian government hurriedly organized. Australian immigration official stated that at the time, thither was an influx of illegal boat arrivals which pushed the federal parliamentary government of Australia to come up with the Pacific Solution Policy in February of 2001. Australias immigration department stated that in February 2002 there were 356 asylum seekers from Iraq mostly, whose status was being processed in the island of Manos in Papua New Guinea, and there were 1,159 refugees in Nauru which overall total is 1,500 asylum seekers. These Islands were happy to take these refugees in an exchange with the financial aid coming from Australia. Though there has been no official report on the figures it has been reported that the president of Nauru Rene Harris negotiated a $15m for the accommodation of more(prenominal) than 1000 asylum seekers ( BBC Q&A, 2002). In the harshest border policy in the Westernized world, the Australian Navy was then deployed to intercept asylum-seekers at sea. The government also excised Australias offshore islands from its immigration zone in order to deprive boat people of the right to claim asylum( Marks, 2007).Where do we draw the line on helping the underprivileged? What should be the guiding rule on welcoming and accepting people running for refuge in our more fortunate land? What are the gracious rights of an individual? The United Nations declaration of human rights proclaims the right1.) To life, to freedom from subjection, to torture, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, or to slavery, servitude or forced labor.2.To autonomy and security of the person. 3.) To a fair trial. 4.) To freedom from retroactive criminal law or punishments. 5.) With respect to private and family life, home, and correspondence. 6.) To freedom of thought.

No comments:

Post a Comment