Sexual Harassment is NOT Tolerable Essay -- Sexual Harassment in the Wo

According to the meet Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) informal torture can be defined as unwelcome internal advances, wishes for cozy favors, and other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature constitutes sexual harassment when submission to or rejection of this conduct clear or completely affects an individuals employment, unreasonably interferes with an individuals work routine or creates a threa going, antagonistic or unpleasant work environment (EEOC, 2002). The victim or harasser can either be a man or a woman, and sexual harassment is not al expressions targeted to members of the opposite sex. Sufferers of sexual harassment in the place of work can be national to fear or anxiety, lower efficiency, a higher level of filter out and substance abuse (EEOC, 2002). Quid pro quo harassment is when employment or employment decisions for an employee are based on that employees reception or sac of unwanted sexual behavior (EEOC, 2002). An example cited by Paul is th at of Valerie Craig, an employee of Y & Y Snacks, Inc. She had joined some co-workers and her supervisor for drinks after work mavin day in July of 1978. Her supervisor drove her home and anticipated that they sire more intimately familiar. She refused his request for sexual relations, upon which she was fired after ten days from the incident. She soon filed a complaint of sexual harassment with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), and the case wound its way through with(predicate) the courts. Craig won, the company was held accountable for damages, and she received back pay, return to work, and an order exclude Y & Y from taking negative action against her in the prospective (Paul, 1998). Sexual harassment in the workplace is not tolerable in spite of the powe... ...d need for an understanding of behaviors, legal environment, social context and educational systems, which exist in the countries in which modern organizations operate. The outcome of this effort s hould be the development of not only a pluralistic organization, but to a fault one with a multicultural workforce from the top ranks all the way to lowest ranks (UMC, 2007).Works CitedEEOC, E. E. (2002). Facts about sexual harrasment. available at http//www.eeoc.gov/facts/fs-sex.html retrieved on 31-10-11 at 1200 am.Goodman, E. (1991). The Reasonable Woman Standard. Boston Globe.Paul, E. F. (1998). Bared crumb and Federal Cases. Society , 352-355.UMC, U. o.-C. (2007). Power And Sexual Harassment -- Men And Women tally Things Differently. Science Daily available at http//www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/04/070403184604.htm retrieved on 1-11-11 at 700 am.