.

Friday, February 15, 2019

Past Contrasted with Present in Faulkners A Rose for Emily :: A Rose for Emily, William Faulkner

foregone Contrasted with Present in Faulkners A bloom for Emily In A Rose for Emily, Faulkner contrasted the past with the represent era. The past was represented in Emily herself, in Colonel Sartoris, in the old Negro servant, and in the calling card of Alderman who accepted the Colonels attitude toward Emily and rescinded her taxes. The present was expressed chiefly through the enounces of the unnamed narrator. The new Board of Aldermen, Homer Barron (the representative of Yankee attitudes toward the Griersons and thus toward the entire South), and in what is called the abutting generation with its more modern ideas all represented the present succession period (Norton Anthology, 2044). Miss Emily was referred to as a fallen monument in the story (Norton Anthology, 2044). She was a monument of Southern gentility, an ideal of past value but fallen because she had shown herself susceptible to death (and decay). The description of her house lifting its pigheaded and coquett ish decay above the cotton wagons and the gasoline pumps--an eyesore among eyesores represented a juxtaposition of the past and present and was an emblematic presentation of Emily herself (Norton Anthology, 2044). The house smells of frame and disuse and has a closed, dank smell. A description of Emily in the hobby paragraph discloses her similarity to the house. She looked bloated like a body long semiaquatic in motionless water, and of that palled hue (Norton Anthology, 2045). But she had not always had that appearance. In the picture of a young Emily with her father, she was frail and apparently hungering to participate in the life of the era. After her fathers death, she looked like a girl with a light-headed resemblance to those angels in colored church windows--sort of tragic and serene (Norton Anthology, 2046). This suggests that she had already begun her entrance into the nether-world. By the time the representatives of the new, progressive Board of Aldermen waited on her concerning her tatterdemalion taxes, she had already completely retreated to her world of the past. She declared that she had no taxes in Jefferson, basing her belief on a verbal agreement made with Colonel Sartoris, who had been abruptly for ten years. Just as Emily refused to acknowledge the death of her father, she now refused to endorse the death of Colonel Sartoris. He had given his word and according to the traditional view, his word knew no death.

No comments:

Post a Comment