Use of Doubt To Persuade Essay -- Successful Persuasion Essays

Persuasion goes on around us everyday, all the time, on television, on advertisements, even in conversations with friends. Perhaps because of this, much has been written on how to persuade more effectively. Most of this literature is built upon the imagination that to persuade is to urge successfully and completely. Going along these lines, certainty and reliance are logical complements to effective persuasion, since we cannot hope to convince others when we are ourselves in question. Doubt, therefore, is felt to be at the other end of the spectrum and antithetical to persuasion. but the art of persuasion is a human art, and so it is a breathing art, which cannot be satisfactorily summed up between the covers of self-improvement guides. In reality, successful persuasion can somewhat deviate from the conventional criteria of certainty in fact, even interrogation can be used to persuade. This exciting first step appears unlikely from the start, because there is an inherent pa radox in the notion that disbelieve can persuade. This contradiction is even clearer when we consider persuasion in the lay down of a speech given to a large audience. To be qualified to hold his own in front of a crowd, the speaker, surely, must be certain of himself and what he wants to say. But there is a possible draw near by which orators can round the corner of persuading with doubt, and even make doubt work to their advantage. Given that the doubt is a shared concern of both(prenominal) the speaker and his audience, a candid confession of uncertainty may ease up new emotional inroads into the audience. By serving as a rough-cut denominator and a common challenge to both parties, a shared doubt when brought into the open can direct the combined energies of the listeners towards finding a workable so... ...nd genuine than an awayward show of sorrow. In this case, to contrive is to constrict. Doubt as an instinct embedded in persuasion transcends common rhetoric as it m oves beyond the rational sphere of intellect into the domain of unbridled emotions. For this reason, and too because it was with an intention to explore persuasion beyond conventional notions that we set out to study the use of doubt in the first place, it is impossible and and so unnecessary to encapsulate the skill of persuading with doubt within any sorting of generalising guidelines. To subject this practice to prescriptive limits is to sever its lifeline-the vital element of spontaneousness that moves with circumstances. As Lee lamented, sometimes, history takes many devious turns it was exactly done one much(prenominal) quirk of history that his speech in 1965 achieved such astonishing payoffs (Press 9).